platform.rst 127 lines (91 with data), 5.0 kB
Platform Architecture overview
I'm told that the reason you build a platform is to "reduce the marginal cost of developing applications." Sounds good. Well, actually it sounds a bit dry. But it's about right, we want to make creating new online development tools faster, easier, and more fun, which I guess is the "reduce the marginal cost" thing.
Platform building blocks
Before we get into the details of how to extend the Allura platform, perhaps it would be smart to explain some of the big pieces and why there are there.
We wanted PyForge tools to be fast, we needed them to scale, and we had some complex requirements for data storage and extensibility. So, we needed a fast, flexible, and easy to use data persistence system.
We were very impressed by the general message architecture of Roundup, but we wanted to extend it from just email messages to include scm commits, and we added a message bus (RabbitMQ which we'll talk about in a second), to make it fast.
We were also impressed by the flexibility of Roundup's Hypertable system in allowing for ad-hock ticket schema additions.
It definitely seemed like something we wanted in a next generation forge, because we wanted app tools to be able to:
- create and version their own document types,
- extend existing document structures,
- and to mange document revisions, access control lists, and other platform level data.
In spite of the power and flexibility of the Roundup HyperTable implementation, we had some concerns about performance and scalability.
Fortunately several of the PyForge authors (including me) used MongoDB in rewriting the download flow of SourceForge.net, and knew that it could handle huge loads (we saturated a 2gb network connection on the server with 6% cpu utilization).
We also knew that MongoDB's flexible replication system would allow us to build the forge in such a way that we could easily provide a package of all project data to developers concerned about lock-in.
Not only that but Rick Copeland had built a couple of custom Object Non-Relational Mappers (ONRMs?) before, including one for MongoDB, and he whipped up Ming, which backed on MongoDB and gave us exactly what we needed.
As I mentioned before we also needed a fast, flexible message bus and queuing system. RabbitMQ was (lightning) fast, (shockingly) flexible, but not supper easy to use. Fortunately we didn't have to roll our own wrapper here, as the Python community already whipped up Carrot, and Celery, which made working with the RabbitMQ based AMQP bus a LOT easer.
Pluggable Event Listeners
Have we mentioned Roundup already? Because here's another idea we stole from them:
Auditors and reactors
Auditors are hooks that get called when events/messages come in, they can modify the message before it is persisted to the document store (via MongoDB).
Once the message is saved to the document store, it is then queued up for another set of hooks -- reactors -- that are not allowed to change the message, but can do things like send e-mail or push a new kind of event onto another queue.
Nearly everything in Roundup is implemented as either an auditor or a reactor, and PyForge definitely steals that idea and runs with it.
TODO: Finish reactor overview (after reactor code is written).
Application Tools
Writing a tool for the new forge is as simple as defining a few controllers to handle particular URL's, templates to render pages, and defining the schemas of any new forge document types that your tool requires.
When you write PyForge tools, you'll get lots of stuff for free:
- Search-ability of your Artifacts
- Artifact versioning for accountability and transparency
- Ability to extend existing Artifacts
- Reuse central User/group/permission management
- A robust and flexible permissions system
- Access to a real-time event publishing system
What's in a tool?
The most basic app tool consists of a few things:
- A controller object (instantiated per request)
- Template files (optional)
- UI Widgets (optional)
- Extensions to existing Artifacts (optional)
- New Artifact types (optional)
- Event listener tools (optional)
- Event publisher (optional)
Users/groups and Permissions
In order to facilitate more open processes, where more users can contribute -- while still protecting data -- documents can easily be "versioned", and the platform provides tools to manage versioned documents for you.